I was now
starting to realize that Yamaha seemed to be making better bikes than Honda.
I had never driven a Yamaha motorbike that had exhibited such poor attentiveness
to detail. But one drives at low speeds on Koh Larn, or at least I did, so
the Honda Click's
handling was adequate for those two days. But
there is no way that I could even begin to be satisfied driving a Honda Click
through the variety of driving conditions I had been putting this new
Yamaha 125 SX rental through. I found the little bike to be an enornously
satisfying mount no matter what I tried to do with it. I also really liked
its looks starting with its new Cyclops styled headlight (which puts out
a lot more light than the Elegance's twin bulbs that are mounted side by
side). I'd describe its overall appearance as minimalistic being
lightweight, with a narrow front end, but which I knew delivered the
goods. Its rakish lines contrasted sharply from such 400
plus pound behemoths as Honda's Forza and Sym's 300 and 400
c.c. cruise boats.
But it was not fast. On route 36 on the way to
Rayong I
managed to do zero to fifty kilometers per hour in 7.51 seconds whereas the Honda Click
took just 6.3 seconds.
The Yamaha
Nouvo SX took 12.16 seconds to get from zero to eighty kilometers per hour
versus 10.39 seconds for the Honda Click 125 i. I do want to
mention, however, that for most of us getting good
acceleration up to 50 kph is much more important than it is
getting good times up to 80 kph. This is because when
you really think about it, when you are driving in cities
such as Pattaya when you go much faster than 50 kph
you feel as if you are really flying and that it starts to
get really unsafe going much faster than 30 miles per hour.
The thing is one doesn't really feel that one is being
deprived by the Yamaha Nouvo SX's apparent lack of power. The power still
seems to be there, but only when you want it.
But more than enough power was there on tap. One simply reels
it in by twisting the grip. In passing situations around
Pattaya the bike performed splendidly, and even while I was doing
the timed acceleration runs on route 36, I really couldnt' detect
any difference between the Honda Click and the Nouvo SX. Only
the stopwatch showed a real difference.
The Nouvo SX has an
interesting little gadget that's a lot of fun to play with. That is,
its little onboard computer that resides in the instrument cluster that normally
consists of a speedometer, odometer, and water temperature guage. Not only
is Yamaha's little onboard computer fun to play with, it also provides a lot of
useful and interesting feedback on what kind of fuel economy one is getting.
One can set it to measure fuel economy at any instant in time for example or one
can set it to register fuel mileage for whatever current trip one is making.
Obviously then one can reset the odometer for each new trip which is something
you cannot do on a lot of competitive models. But the most addictive
feature of this onboard computer is that one can set it to constantly record the
bike's fuel efficiency. For example, as soon as the bike starts to go up a
slight incline the digital display might go from 2.0 (liters per 100 km) to 2.5.
Or if I ease up slightly on the throttle the digital display might go from 1.8
to 1.2. This thing is a blast to watch and it really does help the driver
smooth out his driving technique so that he can get better fuel economy. I
found myself constantly trying to drive the little SX with a more constant
application of the throttle than I had been doing with my Yamaha Elegance.
I started to notice that the SX was averaging 2.1 liters per 100 kilometers
which is a far cry from the 2.5 the first German rental shop owner had been
telling me. One thing I noticed about the Nouvo SX is that it seemed to
inspire its driver to drive smoothly and sedately.
The bike's handling is top notch. It's
so enjoyable to drive and the more one gets used to it the more it feels part of
the driver's body.
The next time you see either a Yamaha Nouvo Elegance or Nouvo
SX notice how forward the seat position appears. This
enables the driver to sit almost on top of the bike's front
wheel. I once measured the distance of the front of my
Elegance's seat to the center of the bike's front tire with a
tape and found it to be 2 inches shorter than the corresponding
difference of the 115 c.c. Nouvo MX it had replaced. The
Elegance's seat is also 2 inches higher than the MX's. One
can be sure that Yamaha's engineers elevated the seat while
positioning it 2 inches forward
deliberately to enable the Elegance to turn very quickly
without having to sacrifice the ride quality imparted by the
Nouvo's relatively long wheelbase. (Note how tall most
dirt bikes are compared to street bikes)
However, when I first got on the Nouvo SX, I could detect a very real
difference in this bike's handling and my Nouvo 135 Elegance's.
The SX's front wheel felt lighter, not as firmly planted and not nearly
as precise. But if there was any lack of preciseness in the bike's
handling the lack went away as I started to get used to the bike and
began to appreciate its charming ways. The reason for all of this
was the oversized aftermarket tires I had installed on my Elegance.
These were Michelin Pilots that were roughly 14 % wider than the bike's
stock tires. I also suspect they are of a softer rubber compound than
the Nouvo's stock tires therefore offering superior handling at the
expense of less longevity. I would rate the SX's handling
and overall feel as excellent even with its stock tires---but I'd have
to rate my modified Nouvo Elegance's handling as superlative.
I took the Nouvo SX back on my fourth day's rental in the middle of a
pouring rainstorm that was flooding many of the city's streets.
That rain got so bad that I had to walk to a nearby restaurant and to
call my girlfriend to get me on her motorbike. After a few minutes
she called me back to tell me that the street we normally took had
flooded and the water had gotten so deep that she decided to take a
different route and meet me somewhere else which forced me to walk a
kilometer away from the restaurant. My girlfriend's bike is
a Yamaha Filano and it rides on 12 inch diameter wheels and tires.
Certainly my Nouvo Elegance is a far superior bike to drive through
flooded streets with its much larger diameter 16 inch wheels and tires.
Moreover, there's several speed bumps I'll ground out on if I'm driving
her Filano and it doesn't matter how slowly I drive it to cross those
speed bumps. The Filano simply lacks the ground clearance to be up to
any Yamaha Nouvo when it comes to crossing obstacles or getting down
flooded streets. And then there's those times that I need to drive
over curbs. Those situations do not occur very often but they do
occur. I'll take a 16 inch diameter wheel and tire anytime
over anything that has 12 or 14 inch wheels and tires.
This now brings us to the subject of my Yamaha Nouvo
Elegance. It had performed astonishly well for fuel economy in highway
driving conditions but not so well in stop and go city driving conditions.
Meanwhile over the four days I had rented it I had gotten an overall average of
44.5 kilometers to the liter on the Yamaha Nouvo SX. That's over 100 miles
to the gallon in the city, which means that all those know it alls out there who
claim that small automatics get miserable fuel economy have no idea of what they
are talking about. The fuel injected Yamaha Nouvo 125 SX wound up registering on its onboard computer
2.1 liters per 100 kilometers. So theoretically according to the computer
I was getting 47.61 kilometers to the liter which meant that the computer
was 7 % too optimistic. However, unlike both the Honda Click 125 i and the
Honda PCX, the Yamaha Nouvo SX 125 lacks the stop start switch that shuts the
bike's engine down while the bike is stopped at traffic lights. In my
opinion much of this 7 % discrepancy is explained by the fact that the bike is
idling at stoplights, therefore using fuel while there is no simultaneous
registering of miles being driven since there are none. The bottom line from
my roadtests--the Yamaha Nouvo SX's onboard computer is pretty accurate.
But now I would use it to see if I could improve on the 32.33 kilometers per
liter I had gotten with my Nouvo Elegance in my earlier
fuel economy tests for city driving.
My more immediate concern was to see how fast my Yamaha Nouvo Elegance
could get up to 50 kph, and then 80 kph. So once again I headed
out to route 36 on the way to Rayong. This time there was less
traffic than I had enountered while testing the Honda Click 125 i's
acceleration. With the Click it had been a one shot deal due to
all that heavy traffic I encountered and also the fact that I was using
my cell phone for a stop watch which had given me at least one false
reading.
The Seiko stopwatch was so much easier to use than the cell phone which
had almost fallen out of my hand as I tried to dodge traffic while
testing the Honda Click. For one thing it had a lanyard that I
wrapped around my wrist. Its start-stop button was large enough
for me to be able to feel it while concentrating on the road ahead of
me.
On the zero to eightly kilometer runs I recorded
times of 12.56, 11.79, 10.54, and 11.72 seconds for an average time of 11.65
seconds which about splits the difference between the Honda Click and the Nouvo
SX. However, on my two runs up to 50 kph I got 5.75 seconds and 5.41
seconds out of my Nouvo Elegance, both times being superior to the 6.3 seconds the Honda Click 125i
had managed.
I ended up doing close to 100
kilometers on my Yamaha Elegance over several days of
testing at the end of which I put in 2.17 liters of fuel.
So I had used less than half of my tank to run around what
felt like a considerable distance, considering that aside
from my acceleration runs and getting to and from where I
could do them, I had to negotiate around a lot of city
traffic and that I actually had to try hard to keep driving
so that I could run off all those kilometers. I wound
up getting 41.9 kilometers to the liter with the Nouvo
Elegance's larger 135 c.c. engine and stone age carburator.
That's a far cry from the 32.33 kilometers per liter I
had gotten before. I can attribute this huge discrepancy to two reasons.
Number one---I didn't have my girlfriend riding with me so the Yamaha's engine
was contending with roughly 45 kilograms less weight. Number two---I was
trying to drive the Nouvo Elegance in the
same type of driving conditions I had encountered with the Nouvo
125 SX and I was trying to drive the Elegance the same way I had been
driving the Nouvo SX 125. For example...I was not trying to
accelerate unnecessarily with either bike and that this habit of not
trying to give the bike any more throttle than I had to had been induced
by the little onboard computer I had so much fun playing with on the
Nouvo SX.
The Honda Click 125i and Yamaha Nouvo Elegance 135 are both slingshots
when it comes to acceleration at lower speeds, say up to 30 miles per
hour or so. The Yamaha Nouvo 125 SX isn't. The power just
doesn't seem to be on tap as it is on the other two bikes, yet it is
there, ready to be reeled in when needed. But the Nouvo Elegance
in particular seems to be always on the boil while driving in the city,
with its torque right there providing instantaneous acceleration.
And it is constantly inviting its driver to hit the throttle by being
willing to respond with an immediacy that makes the engine seem even
larger and more powerful than it already is.
From the specifications I've compiled from a variety of web sites, it
appears that the torque of the Yamaha Elegance 135 exceeds the fuel
injected 125's by just 1.2 %. However, both the seat of the pants
feel and stopwatch measurements, especially from 0-50 kph would seem to
put the Elegance much farther ahead than that. My opinion is that
Yamaha deliberately tuned the 135 Elegance to deliver superior torque
and acceleration at the lower speeds that are common to city driving.
0-80 equates to about 50 miles an hour. You just never make use of
it in cities such as Pattaya when driving 30 miles an hour already
seems a bit too fast. So when Yamaha engineered the 135 Elegance
it engineered it exactly right for the kind of driving most of us do in
such city conditions.
Recently, in my opinion, Yamaha decided that it was starting to lose
sales to other manufacturers such as Honda. It had a terrific
little bike, knew it, and stayed with its carburated Elegance line for
four years. But out of total ignorance and the inability to think
for themselves, many potential customers started to back off from Yamaha
in the mistaken belief that fuel injection automatically provided
superior fuel economy and horsepower to carburators. And in the
case of the Elegance, it might have seemed that way, since the 135's
superior torque and low speed acceleration was constantly inviting
drivers to tap into all that power. After all, it's really a lot
of fun twisting that throttle of the 135 and feeling the bike surge like
a much more powerful machine than what it really is. That's part
of why I think I was able to get just 32.33 kilometers per liter in my
previous tests. But this time I kept resisting the urge to
accelerate convincingly around slower moving vehicles. charge up hills,
or just accelerate with authority simply because it felt good.
The Yamaha Nouvo Elegance 135 will get excellent fuel economy provided
that the driver does his part. It's just that it's a lot easier
for the driver to get outstanding fuel economy with the 125 Nouvo SX
than it is with its carburated sibliing. But I doubt if the
carburator had anything to do with it. Yamaha always had a great
engine in the 135. I don't know how much better fuel economy it
can get over its predecessor the air cooled 115 c.c. Yamaha Nouvo MX,
but I had one, and drove it 13,000 kilometers before replacing it with
the 135 Elegance. Although I never measured the fuel economy of
the Nouvo MX, I knew that the Elegance delivered far superior fuel
economy while delivering over 25 % more power.
One thing I did find disturbing about the Nouvo 125 SX
is Yamaha downsized the fuel tank from the Nouvo Elegance's 4.8 liters to a 4.3
liter tank which I viewed as a step in the wrong direction. The truth is,
when we are comparing one motorbike that already gets over 100 miles to the
gallon to another bike that might offer a tad more fuel economy, the dollars
saved we are talking
about is really meaningless. What is more important is
range. And when it comes to highway driving where the 125 Yamaha SX and
the 135 Yamaha Nouvo Elegance turned in identical fuel economy numbers at a
figure of 50 km/liter, the Elegance will get
25 kilometers farther down the road than the Nouvo SX. And a Honda 150 PCX with its even
larger 5.9 liter fuel tank will have 80 kilometers more range than the Yamaha SX
provided both bikes are getting 50 kilometers per liter, which is easily
obtainable for all the bikes I have mentioned, whether it's the Honda Click 125
i, the Yamaha Nouvo Elegance, the Yamaha Nouvo SX 125, or either the 125
or 150 PCX .
Probably the greatest virtue of the Honda Click 125 i is
that it has a 5.5 liter fuel tank which will probably give it the same range as
its larger stablemate, the Honda PCX 150. Its second greatest virtue is its speed.
If what I am reading is true, Honda stuffed the Honda PCX 125's engine into the
smaller and lighter Click which must make it one of the fastest 125's around.
Keep in mind the 125 PCX is already a good highway bike
even if it is eclipsed
by the 150 PCX, and with a weight of around 280 pounds compared to a Honda
Click's 246 pounds the Honda Click 125i will be noticeably
faster
The main disadvantage of the Yamaha Nouvo Elegance 135
is its carburator but not for the reasons that you might suspect. It's got
one helluva carburator setup, one that offers great fuel economy and excellent
power and driveability. The problem is if you let the Elegance sit around
for anything longer than 3 days it starts to get harder and harder to start due
to gasoline settling in the carburator. If you go back to your home
country for several weeks and return to Thailand, you will find that it's going
to take a lot of cranking of your bike's starter to get your bike moving again
and your battery might just wear down before you get done doing it. So
far, knock on wood, I could always restart my Elegance on the bike's battery
without having to resort to the bike's kickstarter. But if worse comes to
worse, I'll always get it started one way or the other.
Getting back to that issue I have made about range, most
of us aren't going to be doing a lot of highway driving. I could do a lot
of city driving with the Yamaha Nouvo SX without using more than half a tank of
fuel so the problem is not nearly as severe as I suspected. Nevertheless,
I think Yamaha should have increased the Nouvo's gasoline tank's capacity
instead of decreasing it, and if there was any improvements I'd wish Yamaha
would make on succeeding models I would prefer that it would offer increased
tank capacity over any horsepower increases it might make.
In my opinion the new Yamaha Nouvo 125 SX is
the finest all around bike out there for the real world of driving
most of us are going to be doing here in Thailand. It really
offers everything a person realistically might need, and if he
thinks he needs something bigger, I think he's dreaming.
Okay...the PCX 150 is definitely bigger, and it's certainly got more
power, and it is going to be a better motorbike out on the highway
trying to keep up with car traffic. But the Yamaha Nouvo 125
SX is big enough and competent
enough to be driven all over Thailand. But I suggest you don't. Just
one example should I think suffice to explain why.
Although I didn't have any problems doing my zero to fifty and zero to
eighty kph runs with my Nouvo Elegance I was almost killed afterwards.
On the way home on the motorway, I found I had a choice between veering
off the road to the left which would have taken me further South into
Pattaya or traveling straight which would have taken me to Sukamvit at
the Pattaya Nua intersection which would take me directly into Naklua.
So I went straight, accelerating to about fifty miles an hour because I
didn't want to hold up traffic behind me as there was no shoulder to get
onto and I was already in the slow lane. But someone wanted to
pass me who simply couldn't wait. He wanted to turn left so he
zoomed ahead of me and then he cut to the left directly ahead of me so
that he could veer off onto the road that would take him away from
Naklua. So he pulled right out in front of me almost colliding
with me as he suddenly swerved to the left ahead of my bike. It
was a very close call, and it was almost certainly caused by a Thai
driver who had no respect for human life, or driving carefully, or with
consideration. I will also mention now that three times Thai
drivers have passed me on the shoulder of the road while I was driving
my Honda Civic in the right lane at over 65 miles an hour and that each
time I was forced way off to the left to avoid the accident the other
driver was about to cause. This is what I call driving with
homicical intent. It goes beyond driving stupidly or neligently.
It goes into the realm of actually trying to kill someone or oneself or
at least not caring about taking human life.
It is because far too many
Thai drivers drive with homicidal intent and too many unqualified
drivers to start with that now causes me to not even consider buying a
highway cruiser that's capable of running with the big dogs. I
have my Honda Civic for the highway. At least some of the drivers
who might not care if they kill me or not might be somewhat worried
about dying themselves. And certainly a car is much safer in a
crash than any motorcycle which has virtually no chance against a car.
Also one must consider all these tour buses that are proliferating on
Thailand's highways and streets. When it comes to homicical
intent, I think the tour bus drivers take the cake for being homicidal
maniacs. Check them out at night. Very seldom will you ever
see Western faces in those tour buses. And most of them are
Chinese. Consider that this year compared to last year the number
of Chinese tourists nearly doubled, and god knows what increases we are
going to see over the next year or the year after that. There will
be a huge proliferation of tour buses which is already at an
unacceptable level, and that is going to mean that Thailand's highways
and streets are going to become deadlier than ever. Nope--forget
having a large bike. You are going to be far happier with a bike
that's between 125 and 150 cc's and that weighs less than 300 pounds,
and you are going to probably live a lot longer if you do.
Specifications
|
Honda Click
|
Yamaha Nouvo SX
|
Yamaha Nouvo Elegance 135
|
Yamaha
Filano 115
|
Yamaha
N-Max 155
|
Honda
PCX 150
|
displacement c.c.
|
125
|
125
|
135
|
115
|
155
|
153
|
Price
|
46800-52500 baht
|
57000 baht
|
NA
|
46000 baht
|
80000
|
81000
|
Horsepower
|
11.7@8500 rprm
|
10.4
|
11.2
|
|
14.9
|
13.4
|
Torque
|
14/7500 Nm/RPM
|
10.47 Nm @ 6000 rpm
|
10.6N-Nm @ 6,500 rpm
|
|
14.4 Nm @
6000 rpm
|
14.0 Nm @ 5500rpm
|
Weight (KG)
|
246 lbs
|
244 lbs
|
244 lbs
|
216 lbs
|
279 lbs
|
286 lbs
|
Tire Size front
|
+80/90/14 |
+70/90/16 |
+80/90/16 |
90/90/12 |
110/70/13 |
90/90/14 |
Tire Size rear
|
+90/90/14 |
+80/90/16 |
+90/90/16 |
90/90/12 |
130/70/13 |
100/90/14 |
fuel economy
test Loop
|
59.8 km to the liter |
53 km to the liter |
53 km to the liter |
|
|
|
0-50 kph
|
6.3 sec |
7.51 |
5.58 |
6.75 |
4.57 |
4.21 |
0-80 kph
|
10.39 |
12.16 |
11.65 |
N.A. |
8.99 |
10.02 |
Handling
|
OK |
Very good |
Rock solid |
OK |
Rock Solid |
Very good |
storge under seat
|
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Excellent |
fuel tank capacity
|
6.5 liters |
2.3 |
4.8 |
4.4 |
6.6 |
8.0 |
Cooling
|
Water |
Water |
Water |
Aircooled |
Water |
Water |
Fuel system
|
Fuel Inj |
Fuel Inj |
Carb |
Fuel Inj |
Fuel Inj |
Fuel Inj |